{"id":33296,"date":"2024-06-13T10:11:45","date_gmt":"2024-06-13T14:11:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/?p=33296"},"modified":"2024-06-13T10:11:48","modified_gmt":"2024-06-13T14:11:48","slug":"states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/","title":{"rendered":"Los estados tuvieron un \u00e9xito incre\u00edble en reasignar a las personas encarceladas a sus domicilios en 2020: una revisi\u00f3n de los datos"},"content":{"rendered":"

Publicado originalmente en el Iniciativa de pol\u00edtica penitenciaria<\/a> Blog.
Exploramos los informes de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos estatales para mostrar que, a pesar de enfrentar inmensos desaf\u00edos, los estados tuvieron un \u00e9xito notable en poner fin a la manipulaci\u00f3n carcelaria despu\u00e9s del Censo de 2020.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

por Mike Wesler<\/a> y Aleks Kajstura<\/a>, 10 de junio de 2024<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Durante el ciclo de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos de 2020, m\u00e1s de un docena de estados<\/a> se encargaron de hacer lo que la Oficina del Censo se ha negado: poner fin a la manipulaci\u00f3n en las prisiones. A trav\u00e9s de su proceso de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos, trabajaron para corregir la forma defectuosa en que la Oficina cuenta a las personas encarceladas (como residentes de una celda de prisi\u00f3n) y, en cambio, contarlas donde realmente viven, creando distritos legislativos que reflejan con mayor precisi\u00f3n las poblaciones residentes reales.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La manipulaci\u00f3n penitenciaria es un problema creado porque la Oficina del Censo cuenta a las personas encarceladas como residentes de una celda de prisi\u00f3n en lugar de en sus verdaderas comunidades. Cuando los estados utilizan los datos del censo durante su proceso de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos, inflan artificialmente la poblaci\u00f3n de las comunidades penitenciarias y les dan una mayor voz en el gobierno.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Con Un crecimiento tan r\u00e1pido en el movimiento para abordar la manipulaci\u00f3n penitenciaria<\/a>, es natural preguntarse: \u00bfCu\u00e1n exitosos fueron estos estados? \u00bfCu\u00e1ntas personas pudieron contar en sus domicilios?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Es una cuesti\u00f3n importante con enormes implicaciones; 19 estados<\/a> ya est\u00e1n preparados para ajustar sus datos de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos para abordar la manipulaci\u00f3n penitenciaria en el ciclo de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos de 2030. Estas preguntas pueden ayudar a los estados a evaluar c\u00f3mo pueden mejorar durante el ciclo de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos de 2030. Puede guiar a los estados que a\u00fan no han adoptado leyes contra la manipulaci\u00f3n penitenciaria pero que est\u00e1n consider\u00e1ndolas. Finalmente, puede ilustrar c\u00f3mo los estados tienen una capacidad limitada para resolver este problema en formas que la Oficina del Censo no tiene.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Para responder a estas preguntas, revisamos informes y datos de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos de 13 estados que abordaron la manipulaci\u00f3n penitenciaria despu\u00e9s del censo de 2020 para comprender cu\u00e1ntas personas en prisiones estatales intentaron contar en sus comunidades de origen y cu\u00e1ntas pudieron reasignar con \u00e9xito.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La perfecci\u00f3n no es posible, entonces no es el objetivo.<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Antes de profundizar en nuestro an\u00e1lisis, es importante recordar que es imposible y poco realista que los estados reasignen con \u00e9xito a todas las personas que se encuentran en sus prisiones a sus comunidades de origen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hay tres razones principales por las que un estado no puede contar a una persona encarcelada en su domicilio:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. La \u00faltima direcci\u00f3n de la persona est\u00e1 en un estado diferente.<\/strong>: Los estados no tienen el poder de reasignar personas a trav\u00e9s de las fronteras estatales, por lo que no pueden contar a las personas de fuera del estado en su comunidad de origen.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. El estado ha decidido no reasignar a una persona encarcelada por motivos pol\u00edticos.<\/strong>: Desafortunadamente, algunos estados han implementado limitaciones arbitrarias a sus reformas al excluir a ciertas personas encarceladas del conteo en sus comunidades de origen. Por ejemplo, Rhode Island hizo el trabajo de mapeo de todas las personas encarceladas en las instalaciones correccionales estatales. Sin embargo, opt\u00f3 por contar en los datos de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos a las personas encarceladas a las que les quedaban m\u00e1s de dos a\u00f1os de sentencia en la ubicaci\u00f3n de la prisi\u00f3n. Mientras nosotros y otras organizaciones creo que esto es un error<\/a>, es la elecci\u00f3n que han hecho los formuladores de pol\u00edticas, por lo que el personal de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos no pudo contarlos en su comunidad de origen.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Datos err\u00f3neos o faltantes<\/strong>: Los funcionarios estatales de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos a menudo dependen de su Departamento Correccional (DOC) para obtener datos de direcciones de personas encarceladas. Generalmente, esos datos contienen todo lo que necesitan para implementar sus reformas. Sin embargo, a veces faltan datos o son err\u00f3neos. Aparte de los errores tipogr\u00e1ficos y otros errores de mantenimiento de registros en los datos de la direcci\u00f3n particular, hay algunas situaciones en las que las direcciones particulares faltan por completo. Por ejemplo, si una persona encarcelada indic\u00f3 que no ten\u00eda vivienda antes de ingresar a prisi\u00f3n, el DOC probablemente dejar\u00e1 el campo de direcci\u00f3n en blanco o anotar\u00e1 "sin hogar". Esta puede ser una respuesta apropiada para el personal penitenciario, pero crea problemas para los funcionarios de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Si bien hay algunas medidas que los funcionarios de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos pueden tomar para reducir este n\u00famero, a menudo lleva tiempo, algo de lo que no disponen mucho.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Estas limitaciones hacen imposible que un estado reasigne 100% de personas en sus prisiones a sus comunidades de origen, por lo que cuando eval\u00faan su \u00e9xito, no deber\u00edan calificarse a s\u00ed mismos como perfectos. En lugar de ello, deber\u00edan preguntarse: \u201cDe las personas que fue posible reasignar, \u00bfa cu\u00e1ntas reasignamos?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \u00bfC\u00f3mo les fue a los estados?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Para nuestro an\u00e1lisis, analizamos dos n\u00fameros clave:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
    1. La tasa de \u00e9xito del estado en la reasignaci\u00f3n de personas que era posible contar en casa.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    2. El porcentaje total de personas en prisiones estatales contadas en su domicilio.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

      Nuestro an\u00e1lisis:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      muestra que a la mayor\u00eda de los estados les fue notablemente bien. Esto es digno de menci\u00f3n porque 2020 fue un ciclo de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos notoriamente dif\u00edcil, en el que los datos del censo se retrasaron y muchos estados adoptaron leyes de reforma de manipulaci\u00f3n penitenciaria a finales de la d\u00e9cada.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      De los 13 estados que analizamos, 10 publicaron su metodolog\u00eda. Nueve de cada 10 pudieron reasignar al menos 80% de personas con direcciones que cumpl\u00edan con los criterios de los estados, siendo Nevada la \u00fanica excepci\u00f3n. Sorprendentemente, California logr\u00f3 mapear cada direcci\u00f3n que intent\u00f3.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Estado<\/th>Tasa de \u00e9xito en la reasignaci\u00f3n de personas cuya direcci\u00f3n cumpli\u00f3 con los criterios del estado<\/th>Porcentaje de personas en prisiones estatales contadas exitosamente en su domicilio<\/th><\/tr>
      California<\/td>100.0%<\/td>99.7%<\/td><\/tr>
      Colorado<\/td>88.5%<\/td>82.1%<\/td><\/tr>
      Connecticut<\/td>96.9%<\/td>87.6%<\/td><\/tr>
      Delaware<\/td>85.5%<\/td>79.2%<\/td><\/tr>
      Maryland<\/td>84.8%<\/td>77.0%<\/td><\/tr>
      Montana<\/td>96.3%<\/td>45.3%<\/td><\/tr>
      Nevada<\/td>68.9%<\/td>64.1%<\/td><\/tr>
      New Jersey<\/td>95.3%<\/td>89.5%<\/td><\/tr>
      Nueva York<\/td>91.9%<\/td>91.9%<\/td><\/tr>
      Pensilvania<\/td>Estado no public\u00f3 metodolog\u00eda<\/td>60.6%<\/td><\/tr>
      Rhode Island<\/td>83.1%<\/td>41.0%<\/td><\/tr>
      Virginia<\/td>Estado no public\u00f3 metodolog\u00eda<\/td>88.2%<\/td><\/tr>
      Washington<\/td>Estado no public\u00f3 metodolog\u00eda<\/td>91.4%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

      Los estados tuvieron tanto \u00e9xito que incluso en dos de los tres estados donde no pudimos analizar completamente la tasa de \u00e9xito porque no publicaron su metodolog\u00eda (Virginia y Washington), podemos decir que aproximadamente 90% de su poblaci\u00f3n penitenciaria estatal total fue reasignado con \u00e9xito a sus comunidades de origen. Es importante destacar que, al igual que Rhode Island (que explicamos anteriormente), Pensilvania tambi\u00e9n tom\u00f3 la decisi\u00f3n pol\u00edtica de excluir a ciertas personas encarceladas de estas reformas, reduciendo instant\u00e1neamente la porci\u00f3n de su poblaci\u00f3n carcelaria que pod\u00eda contarse en casa.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Llegando a 100%<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      Si bien los estados han hecho un trabajo notable al implementar estas reformas, cada persona encarcelada debe ser contada en sus comunidades de origen para prop\u00f3sitos de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos. \u00bfQu\u00e9 pueden hacer los funcionarios del gobierno para lograr esto?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        \n
      1. Empiece a recopilar, evaluar y limpiar datos con antelaci\u00f3n<\/strong>: Obtener buenos datos del Departamento Correccional es fundamental para implementar reformas con \u00e9xito. Es por eso que los funcionarios estatales de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos deber\u00edan trabajar con esa agencia. ahora<\/strong> para garantizar que est\u00e9 recopilando los datos que necesitar\u00e1n durante el pr\u00f3ximo ciclo de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos. De manera similar, los estados que a\u00fan no han abordado la manipulaci\u00f3n penitenciaria deber\u00edan adoptar e implementar pol\u00edticas para hacerlo ahora. Esto garantizar\u00e1 que las prisiones recopilen y mantengan datos de direcciones de alta calidad de las personas que encarcelan.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      2. No adoptar limitaciones arbitrarias a las reformas<\/strong>: Al adoptar reformas contra la manipulaci\u00f3n penitenciaria, los estados deben incluir a todas las personas encarceladas, independientemente de la duraci\u00f3n de su sentencia. Incluso si es probable que una persona pase d\u00e9cadas tras las rejas, es todav\u00eda no soy residente del distrito legislativo que contiene la prisi\u00f3n<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
          \n
        1. \u2014 no tienen v\u00ednculos con esa comunidad, no la llaman hogar, y si tienen un problema que quieren que los legisladores solucionen, no es probable que llamen al legislador que representa la prisi\u00f3n sino a los funcionarios electos de su comunidad de origen, por lo que la ciudad donde se encuentra la prisi\u00f3n no deber\u00eda tener una voz excesiva en el gobierno simplemente porque la instalaci\u00f3n est\u00e9 ubicada all\u00ed.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        2. La Oficina del Censo debe cambiar sus pol\u00edticas<\/strong>: Incluso si los estados hacen todo lo que est\u00e1 a su alcance para abordar la manipulaci\u00f3n penitenciaria, todav\u00eda habr\u00e1 algunas personas encarceladas que no podr\u00e1n contar en sus distritos de origen, con mayor frecuencia aquellos que provienen de diferentes estados. De manera similar, pero no cubierto en este an\u00e1lisis, si un estado contiene una prisi\u00f3n federal, Los funcionarios de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos no pueden reasignar a esas personas encarceladas a sus comunidades de origen.<\/a>. La Oficina del Censo es la \u00fanica entidad gubernamental con el poder de abordar este problema por completo y a trav\u00e9s de las fronteras estatales.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

          Este an\u00e1lisis muestra que los estados han tenido un \u00e9xito incre\u00edble en la implementaci\u00f3n de reformas para abordar la manipulaci\u00f3n penitenciaria. La historia sugiere que si la Oficina del Censo no logra resolver este problema, a los estados les ir\u00e1 a\u00fan mejor durante el ciclo de redistribuci\u00f3n de distritos de 2030. Esto deber\u00eda dar confianza a los lugares que est\u00e1n considerando reformas similares y motivarlos a actuar ahora.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Sin embargo, en \u00faltima instancia, para abordar plenamente la manipulaci\u00f3n carcelaria, la Oficina del Censo deber\u00eda escuche el creciente consenso bipartidista entre los estados<\/a> y ajustar sus pol\u00edticas para poner fin a la manipulaci\u00f3n carcelaria en todo el pa\u00eds.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

          Originally published in the Prison Policy Initiative blog. We explore state redistricting reports to show that, despite facing immense challenges, states were remarkably successful ending prison gerrymandering after the 2020 Census. by Mike Wessler and Aleks Kajstura, June 10, 2024 During the 2020 redistricting cycle, more than a dozen states took it upon themselves to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":6196,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_gspb_post_css":"","progress_planner_page_todos":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":3,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"progress_planner_page_types":[],"class_list":["post-33296","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-prison-gerrymandering"],"yoast_head":"\nStates were incredibly successful at reallocating incarcerated people to their home addresses in 2020: A review of the data – Voting Access For All<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Prison Gerrymandering\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_MX\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"States were incredibly successful at reallocating incarcerated people to their home addresses in 2020: A review of the data – Voting Access For All\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Prison Gerrymandering\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Voting Access For All\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/VotingAccessForAll\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-06-13T14:11:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-06-13T14:11:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Untitled_Artwork.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2048\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2048\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Margaret\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Margaret\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Margaret\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/983cfad489dc1272208e80c46104a3e6\"},\"headline\":\"States were incredibly successful at reallocating incarcerated people to their home addresses in 2020: A review of the data\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-13T14:11:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-06-13T14:11:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1365,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/Untitled_Artwork.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Prison Gerrymandering\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\\\/\",\"name\":\"States were incredibly successful at reallocating incarcerated people to their home addresses in 2020: A review of the data – Voting Access For All\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/Untitled_Artwork.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-13T14:11:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-06-13T14:11:48+00:00\",\"description\":\"Prison Gerrymandering\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/Untitled_Artwork.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/Untitled_Artwork.jpg\",\"width\":2048,\"height\":2048,\"caption\":\"Prison Policy Initiative\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"States were incredibly successful at reallocating incarcerated people to their home addresses in 2020: A review of the data\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"Voting Access For All\",\"description\":\"Empowering ALL Michigan Voters: Voting Is Your Right!\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Voting Access for All Coalition\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/cropped-VAAC_logo_Small.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/cropped-VAAC_logo_Small.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Voting Access for All Coalition\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/VotingAccessForAll\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/votingaccessforall\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@VotingAccessForAll\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/voting-access-for-all-vaac\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/bsky.app\\\/profile\\\/votingaccessforall.bsky.social\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/983cfad489dc1272208e80c46104a3e6\",\"name\":\"Margaret\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3b1aa2145a21b0b240f706a51eb460e584da99e2feefd4e50b40544f2fe9f972?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3b1aa2145a21b0b240f706a51eb460e584da99e2feefd4e50b40544f2fe9f972?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3b1aa2145a21b0b240f706a51eb460e584da99e2feefd4e50b40544f2fe9f972?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Margaret\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/votingaccessforall.org\\\/es\\\/author\\\/margaret\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Los estados tuvieron un \u00e9xito incre\u00edble en la reasignaci\u00f3n de personas encarceladas a sus domicilios en 2020: una revisi\u00f3n de los datos \u2013 Acceso al voto para todos","description":"Gerrymandering de prisiones","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/","og_locale":"es_MX","og_type":"article","og_title":"States were incredibly successful at reallocating incarcerated people to their home addresses in 2020: A review of the data – Voting Access For All","og_description":"Prison Gerrymandering","og_url":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/","og_site_name":"Voting Access For All","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/VotingAccessForAll\/","article_published_time":"2024-06-13T14:11:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-06-13T14:11:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2048,"height":2048,"url":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Untitled_Artwork.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Margaret","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Margaret","Tiempo de lectura":"7 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/"},"author":{"name":"Margaret","@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/#\/schema\/person\/983cfad489dc1272208e80c46104a3e6"},"headline":"States were incredibly successful at reallocating incarcerated people to their home addresses in 2020: A review of the data","datePublished":"2024-06-13T14:11:45+00:00","dateModified":"2024-06-13T14:11:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/"},"wordCount":1365,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Untitled_Artwork.jpg","articleSection":["Prison Gerrymandering"],"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/","url":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/","name":"Los estados tuvieron un \u00e9xito incre\u00edble en la reasignaci\u00f3n de personas encarceladas a sus domicilios en 2020: una revisi\u00f3n de los datos \u2013 Acceso al voto para todos","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Untitled_Artwork.jpg","datePublished":"2024-06-13T14:11:45+00:00","dateModified":"2024-06-13T14:11:48+00:00","description":"Gerrymandering de prisiones","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Untitled_Artwork.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Untitled_Artwork.jpg","width":2048,"height":2048,"caption":"Prison Policy Initiative"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/2024\/06\/states-were-incredibly-successful-at-reallocating-incarcerated-people-to-their-home-addresses-in-2020-a-review-of-the-data\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"States were incredibly successful at reallocating incarcerated people to their home addresses in 2020: A review of the data"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/","name":"Acceso a la votaci\u00f3n para todos","description":"Empoderando a TODOS los votantes de Michigan:<br \/>\u00a1Votar es su derecho!","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/#organization","name":"Coalici\u00f3n de acceso a la votaci\u00f3n para todos","url":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/cropped-VAAC_logo_Small.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/cropped-VAAC_logo_Small.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Voting Access for All Coalition"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/VotingAccessForAll\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/votingaccessforall\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@VotingAccessForAll","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/voting-access-for-all-vaac\/","https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/votingaccessforall.bsky.social"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/#\/schema\/person\/983cfad489dc1272208e80c46104a3e6","name":"Margarita","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3b1aa2145a21b0b240f706a51eb460e584da99e2feefd4e50b40544f2fe9f972?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3b1aa2145a21b0b240f706a51eb460e584da99e2feefd4e50b40544f2fe9f972?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3b1aa2145a21b0b240f706a51eb460e584da99e2feefd4e50b40544f2fe9f972?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Margaret"},"url":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/author\/margaret\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33296","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33296"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33296\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33301,"href":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33296\/revisions\/33301"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6196"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33296"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33296"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33296"},{"taxonomy":"progress_planner_page_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/votingaccessforall.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/progress_planner_page_types?post=33296"}],"curies":[{"name":"gracias","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}